16:I[3747,["668","static/chunks/668-7b8210e686eeae2d.js","63","static/chunks/63-de82db724ea4b008.js","874","static/chunks/874-17468c542db23d78.js","959","static/chunks/app/search/page-36d35c5c0c155932.js"],"default"] 17:T6d3,

The Studio System in Music: Echoes of Control

While the term "studio system" is most often associated with Hollywood cinema, the music industry has also experienced periods of similar control and influence. Though not identical in structure, major record labels have, at times, wielded considerable power over artists' careers, mirroring the studio system's vertically integrated model.

Record Labels as Gatekeepers

During the mid-20th century, major record labels like RCA, Columbia, and Decca acted as gatekeepers, controlling access to recording studios, distribution networks, and radio airplay. Artists often signed exclusive contracts that gave the labels significant control over their creative output and financial earnings. The labels essentially functioned as creative hubs, determining the sound and direction of many popular musical acts.

The Indie Revolution and Fragmentation

The rise of independent labels and DIY recording technologies in the late 20th century challenged the dominance of the major labels. Artists gained more autonomy, and the industry became more fragmented. While major labels still hold considerable power, the internet and digital distribution have further democratized the music landscape, allowing independent artists to reach audiences directly. However, the echoes of the old system still resonate in the contractual obligations and creative constraints faced by many artists today. The constant search for the next big star or trend also continues. The major labels always try to maintain market dominance, even in the digital age. The pursuit of creative vision, while still a factor, is always tempered by financial considerations.

8:["$","div",null,{"className":"space-y-12","children":[["$","section",null,

Results for "market dominance"